3.4 The Martingale Formulation

Definition 3.4.1 (Martingale Problem).label Let $a: [0, \infty) \times C([0, \infty); \real^{n}) \to L(\real^{n}; \real^{n})$ and $b: [0, \infty) \times C([0, \infty); \real^{n}) \to \real^{n}$ be previsible path functionals. For each $u \in C_{c}^{\infty}(\real^{n})$, let

\[Lu = \frac{1}{2}\dpn{A, D^2f}{\real^{n \times n}}+ \dpn{b, Df}{\real^n}\]

then for any $y \in \real^{n}$, filtered probability space $(\Omega, \bracs{\cf_t|t \ge 0}, \bp)$, and $X: \Omega \to C([0, \infty); \real^{n})$, $X$ is a solution to the martingale problem for $(a, b)$ starting at $y$ if:

  1. (1)

    $X_{0} = y$ almost surely.

  2. (2)

    For each $f \in C_{c}^{\infty}(\real^{n})$, the process

    \[C_{t}^{f} = f(X_{t}) - f(X_{0}) - \int_{0}^{t} Lf(s, X_{s})ds\]

    is a $\bracs{\mathcal{F}_t}$-martinagle.

If the distribution of $X$ on $C([0, \infty); \real^{n})$ is the unique distribution satisfying the above, then the solution for the martingale problem is unique. If for each $y \in \real^{n}$, such a solution exists, then the martingale problem is well posed.

Theorem 3.4.2 (Equivalence of Formulations).label Let $(\Omega, \bracsn{\cf_t|t \ge 0}, \bp)$ be a filtered probability space, $B$ be a $\bracs{\mathcal{F}_t}$-Brownian motion, $\sigma: [0, \infty) \times C([0, \infty); \real^{n}) \to L(\real^{n}; \real^{n})$ and $b: [0, \infty) \times C([0, \infty); \real^{n}) \to \real^{n}$ be bounded measurable functions such that $\sigma_{t}$ is invertible for all $t \ge 0$.

Let $y \in \real^{n}$ and $X: \Omega \to C([0, \infty); \real^{n})$ be a solution to the martingale problem for $(\sigma^{*}\sigma, b)$ starting at $y$, then there exists a weak solution of the SDE

\[Y_{t} = Y_{0} + \int_{0}^{t} \sigma(s, Y) dB_{s} + \int_{0}^{t} b(s, Y)ds\]

starting at $y$ whose distribution is the same as $X$.

Proof, [Theorem 20.1, RW89]. By truncation, for each $1 \le i \le n$,

\[M_{t} = X_{t} - \int_{0}^{t} b(s, X)ds\]

and

\[M_{t}M_{t}^{T} - \int_{0}^{t} a(s, X)ds\]

are local martingales. In which case, by Lévy’s characterisation of Brownian motion,

\[\td B_{t} = \int_{0}^{t} \sigma(s, X)^{-1}dM_{s}\]

is a standard Brownian motion, and $X$ and $\td B$ satisfy the SDE.$\square$

Theorem 3.4.3.label Let $a: \real^{n} \to L(\real^{n}; \real^{n})$ and $b: \real^{n} \to \real^{n}$ be bounded measurable functions such that the martingale problem for $(a, b)$ is well-posed, that is, let

\[Lu = \frac{1}{2}\dpn{A, D^2f}{\real^{n \times n}}+ \dpn{b, Df}{\real^n}\]

then for each $y \in \real^{n}$, there exists a unique probability measure $\bp^{y}$ on $C([0, \infty); \real^{n})$ such that:

  1. (1)

    $\bp^{y}(x_{0} = y) = 1$.

  2. (2)

    For each $f \in C_{c}^{\infty}$,

    \[C_{t}^{f} = f(\pi_{t}) - f(x_{0}) - \int_{0}^{t} Lf(x_{s})ds\]

    is a $\bp^{y}$-martingale.

then

  1. (1)

    $\bracs{x_t|t \ge 0}$ is a time-homogeneous strong Markov process with respect to $\bp^{y}$.

  2. (2)

    If $a = \sigma \sigma^{*}$ and $(\sigma, b)$ satisfy the Lipschitz condition, then the generator of the above process is $L$.